India is a country of vast diversity, having people with
different race, religion and language, and it is marching towards forming a
strong nation. It is also accepted that India is a nation in making, and being
a nation in making we have to look for the common interest all the time.
As an example, we had various indirect taxes which was a
headache for the tax payers, but now we have come up with GST which is clubbing
all the indirect taxes and we have many other examples where we had opted for
the thing which is common for all. Likewise, we need to club all the personal
laws which are in force to bring out a common civil code for all.
Our Constitution makers also felt the need for the
uniformity in personal laws, so they kept the provision of Uniform Civil Code
as a part of Directive Principle of State Policy in Article 44.
Need for a
Common Civil Code
There are many laws regarding marriage, divorce and
inheritance which are in force in India, and they are used according to the
religion of the parties. Some of the examples are Hindu Marriage Act 1955,
Special Marriage Act 1954, Dowry Prohibition(Amendment) Act 1984, Domestic
Violence Act 2005, Hindu Succession Act 1956 and various other inheritance
norms based on different religion. All these laws and norm are enforced till
today, but there are many loopholes and there are also many areas which are not
covered like Triple talaq, polygamy in Muslim, depriving of property right to
Hindu Women etc.
According to the existing laws Christians and Muslim women
are comparatively far better than Hindu women, because both for Christian and
Muslim have the full-fledged right to own property but the Hindu women has no
right to own property.
There is also a problem of triple talaq and polygamy in Muslim
community, which directly challenges the dignity of any Muslim wife. This is a
major element which majority of the Muslim women want to eliminate from the
existing Muslim Personal Law.
In order to bridge the difference in marriage, divorce and
inheritance laws of different religions and also to address the discrimination
faced by women in such cases we need a Common Civil Code to minimize the cases
in a long-term perspective, instead of amending the existing laws one by one.
Calls for
the Common Civil Code
The call for a Uniform Civil Code started right from the
very early stage of Independent India. Leaders like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and
Jawaharlal Nehru were of the view that being a secular country India needed a Uniform
Civil Code, but they could not enact the law because of heavy opposition from
seniors like Dr. Rajendra Prasad and Vallabhbhai Patel, and also from many
sections of the then Indian society.
Supreme Court ordered the government to enact the bill since
Shah Bano case in 1985. Before the Shah Bano case, Supreme Court had tried two
similar cases under Criminal Code. Since then Supreme Court had reminded the
Government about the need for a Common Civil Code on several instances.
Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan and several other Muslim
Women Social Activists are calling for a codified Muslim Family law. In one of
the study done by BMMA in 10 states of the country out of 4710 Muslim women,
92.1% of the women want total ban on oral/unilateral divorce (Triple Talaq) and
91.7% of the women are opposed to polygamy.
Many right wing organisations are also supporting the Uniform
Civil Code with some ulterior motives. They are even encouraging people,
through many mediums, to support Uniform Civil Code.
Dead set
against
All India Muslim Personal Law Board is spearheading the
movement against Uniform Civil Code and they got the support from many regional
and national parties like CPI(M), AITC, BSP and AIMIM. They are also organizing
a signature campaign against it.
According to them Uniform Civil Code will infringe the
Sharia- the Islamic jurisprudence based on Quranic teaching. They also stated
that there is no need for addition or deletion on the existing law regarding
marriage, divorce and inheritance, as the Sharia itself is total and complete.
And also, many experts are of the view that the motive
behind the proposal of Uniform Civil Code is to curtail the Muslim Laws in the
country and to establish a Hindutva based law throughout the
country.
Way Out
The cases of discrimination faced by women in a marriage
institution is common to all the religions and we need a solution to minimize
the number of such cases for the greater interest of our country.
It is the government who has to act first, so the government
has asked the opinion of the Law Commission to examine all aspects pertaining
to Uniform Civil Code. And on the other hand, the union government should also
bring all the opposition parties under confidence and draft the bill without
any biases on religious line.
Many constitutional experts and legal experts are calling
for a Uniform Civil Code to save the dignity of women and also, to show the
genuineness of our Secular Stand.
Government should work honestly to serve the needs of the
country and people should also understand the need for change to serve our
collective interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment